Frequently asked questions about academic support

Send your degree, university, academic guide, deadline, project type, and current progress. Include your draft and supervisor feedback when available so the required work can be scoped accurately.

Yes. We first assess usable material, supervisor feedback, and unresolved decisions. Support can focus on one correction or connect several stages when the issue affects the full project.

We assess projects across disciplines, but first confirm that a suitable specialist and viable scope are available. Methods, sources, and deliverables differ between technical, legal, health, and education projects.

It depends on the starting point, length, method, and review dates. A responsible schedule separates assessment, sources, development, corrections, and defense instead of promising the same deadline for every project.

Each stage has an objective, source materials, deliverable, and review criterion. Topic, objectives, and structure are settled before sources, method, development, formal corrections, and defense preparation.

Yes. Your academic guide and rubric determine structure, length, citation style, format, and assessment criteria. Specific supervisor instructions are also incorporated when consistent with university requirements.

We request the complete feedback and the reviewed version. Each observation becomes an action, with objective and method changes prioritized before formal editing.

Yes. An assessment can focus on topic, outline, method, analysis, editing, citations, plagiarism review, or defense. Tell us which decisions have already been approved by your supervisor.

The time needed for a TFG depends on the starting point, length, method, and deadline; there is no single valid schedule for every project. Plan assessment, sources, structure, development, corrections, and defense around your academic guide and university milestones.

Plan your TFG· TFG planner

Progressing a TFG in one week, two weeks, or one month can be viable only when the remaining work, academic guide, materials, and review dates allow it; a short deadline does not guarantee that a full TFG can be completed. First identify which stages are already approved and prioritise those that affect objectives, method, and submission.

How to progress with little time· TFG planner

If your supervisor rejects a submission or requests changes, review the full feedback and the assessed version before changing anything. Turn each observation into an action, prioritise objectives, structure, and method first, and leave formatting and style for a second review.

Correct a TFG· Respond to supervisor feedback

If you fail your TFG, review the assessment record, rubric, and feedback to identify what must be corrected and when you can submit again. The rules and procedure depend on your university, so confirm the applicable deadlines, requirements, and review route with your supervisor or academic office.

Prepare a TFG correction· Targeted TFG support

Turnitin can show a signal for text its model considers likely AI-generated when an institution has that feature enabled, but that signal does not identify ChatGPT with certainty or prove academic misconduct by itself. Turnitin’s own guidance says the result requires human review and application of each institution’s policy.

TFG similarity review· Limits of AI detectors· Turnitin’s official AI Writing Report guide

There is no universal acceptable Turnitin percentage for a TFG: the similarity percentage reflects matching text and must be interpreted according to the source, citations, and your university’s rules. A reference, properly attributed quotation, or formula can create matches, so the report does not replace academic review.

How to interpret a similarity report· Correct citations and references· Turnitin’s official similarity-score guide

Length, degree, method, draft status, urgency, and included services are considered. A per-page reference helps estimate cost, but the final quote defines deliverables, schedule, and revisions.

It is an initial reference for compatible work. Complex tables, data analysis, plans, programming, specialist research, or short deadlines can change the cost and must be specified in the quote.

When the scope allows it, the proposal can be divided into deliverables with an amount, date, and review criterion so progress can be checked before the next stage.

No. The assessment explains scope, schedule, required materials, and price before you decide. Work begins only after the conditions and first milestone are accepted.

We review coherence between objectives, method, results, and conclusions; citations and references; tables, figures, appendices, and formatting. Checks are adapted to the rubric and project type.

Not by itself. Each match must be interpreted. References, formulas, or correct quotations may match, while poor paraphrasing can require changes even when the total percentage is low.

We can review slide structure, timing, method explanation, result interpretation, and likely questions. Preparation uses the final document so you can defend decisions you understand.

No. Grades depend on the project, student, supervisor, and panel. We can define verifiable criteria, review compliance with the academic guide, and prepare each submission with traceable changes.

Yes. An assessment can cover guidance, planning, methodology, analysis, review, corrections, formatting, slides, or defence preparation, separately or combined. A full-project development scope can also be assessed on request. Scope, deliverables, and participation are defined before the proposal is accepted.

A change to topic, method, materials, length, or deadline can affect planned deliverables. It is reviewed before work continues to determine whether it fits the agreed scope or needs a new assessment, rather than treating a substantial change as an ordinary revision.

Contractual issues are initially handled through a documented, amicable route. The applicable treatment depends on the accepted service conditions and relevant law; this FAQ does not replace those terms. Review the proposal and terms before contracting to understand what applies to your case.